Forums / Political & Legal / Brady Sends Obama Its Pre-Inauguration Wish List

5 years 46 weeks ago, 9:48 AM

Eturnit3

Eturnit3's picture

Rank:
Lieutenant General
Points:
798
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Location:
Grass Valley , CA

Friday, January 16, 2009

No one, including the Brady Campaign, seriously believes that Barack Obama was elected president because of his support for gun control. But Brady is pretending that it provided Obama the margin of victory in November, and has provided him with a very long list of gun bans and other restrictions that it expects from him in return.

If for no other reason, Obama might want to tell Brady "no," because if he were to do their bidding, they would be sure to demand that he do even more. That's demonstrated by Brady's statement that their current request "is not intended to present an exhaustive list . . . but does provide a starting point." It includes:

A California-style "assault weapons" ban. For several years, Brady has referred to California's ban--which is far more restrictive than the federal ban of 1994-2004--as the "model" for the rest of the nation. Brady doesn't say so, but it clearly supports--as does the Violence Policy Center--the California--like ban that Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.) has proposed in Congress since before the 1994 semi-automatic firearm ban expired. Among its differences from the 1994 ban, the McCarthy bill would ban rifles like the AR-15, even if they do not have a flash suppressor, bayonet mount, or adjustable-position stock. It would ban the M1, the M1 Carbine, the Ruger Mini-14 series, the SKS, and many other semi-automatic rifles not previously labeled as "assault weapons." And it would ban every semi-automatic shotgun, by banning its receiver. Brady wants .50 caliber rifles banned as well.

A ban on standard magazines designed for self-defense. Brady calls them "high-capacity," but magazines that hold more than 10 rounds are designed for self-defense, as demonstrated by the fact that most guns that use standard defensive magazines (those holding more than 10 rounds) are handguns designed for self-defense, and used for that purpose by private citizens, law enforcement officers, and military personnel alike.

Now's as good a time as any to dispel one blatant lie that Brady includes with its wish list. Brady says, "Beginning with the Brady Law in 1993, the assault weapon ban in 1994, and other Clinton Administration policies, our nation experienced an historic decline in gun crime and violence," adding, "during the Bush years, gun crime increased as the Administration and Congress . . . allowed the assault weapons ban to expire [and] gave the gun industry special legal protection."

The truth is, violent crime began declining in 1991, three years before the Brady Act and the semi-automatic firearm ban, and more than a year before Bill Clinton took office. And, the nation's violent crime rate has declined another eight percent since President Bush took office.

Moreover, in 1998, the Brady Act's waiting period on gun sales ceased, because it was replaced by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), which the Brady Campaign has always opposed (though they try to take credit for it today, inappropriately referring to NICS checks as "Brady checks.") And, contrary to Brady's prediction that crime rates would soar if the semi-automatic firearm ban expired, the ban expired in 2004, and since then violent crime rates have been lower than anytime in the last 31 years.

Repeal the recent Department of the Interior rule allowing state law to determine how firearms may be carried in National Parks and wildlife refuges. Brady offers no evidence to support its hunch that allowing permit-holders to carry concealed firearms "would increase the risk of gun crime, injury and death in the parks and wildlife refuges." But as for Brady's hunches, for the last 20 years it has predicted that allowing people to carry guns for protection will cause murder rates to soar, but people now carry guns for protection in 40 states and since 1999, murder rates have been lower than anytime since the mid-1960s.

Repeal the Tiahrt Amendment and the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). Brady complains that the Tiahrt Amendment "restricts disclosure of the data to law enforcement," and prevents the BATFE from disclosing firearm-tracing data to the public. The first claim is a lie. The amendment allows BATFE to provide the data to any law enforcement agency involved in a bona fide investigation related to a traced firearm.

Tracing data is not released to the public so that, among other reasons, criminals won't know that the police are investigating them. Brady should just tell the truth, for once: even though the BATFE and Congressional Research Service repeatedly state that tracing data are not reliable enough to draw conclusions about the criminal use of guns generally, Brady wants the data so it can concoct bogus claims to use in lawsuits against firearm manufacturers who comply with every applicable firearm law. These lawsuits are currently prohibited by the PLCAA, which Brady hopes to overturn.

Require all firearm sales to go through NICS (advocated by Mr. Obama's choice for Attorney General, Eric Holder), and allow the FBI to retain the records of all NICS-approved firearm transfers. It used to be that Brady claimed that the only private transfers that it wanted run through NICS were those taking place at gun shows. Now, it's all private transfers, including gifts between family members and sales or trades between friends. And, it wants the FBI to record all transfers. Translation: Gun and gun owner registration, no two ways about it.

Allow a NICS check to reject someone whose name is on an FBI watch list. This is yet another idea recommended by prospective Attorney General Holder and Obama adviser Rahm Emanuel. The obvious problem with it is that you can get on one of these lists by having the same name as a suspected criminal or terrorist, and if you are on a list, you may not be able to determine which one you are on, much less get yourself removed. Sen. Ted Kennedy even ended up on a "no fly" list, for reasons that have not been made public.

Prohibit the sale of more than one handgun to a single individual in a 30-day period, in order to thwart "large-volume" illegal gun traffickers. Federal law already requires a dealer to report to law enforcement authorities whenever a person buys more than one handgun in a five-day period. This proposal amounts to the rationing of a constitutional right with no crime-reduction benefit.

Require all new guns to micro-stamp ammunition with serial numbers linking the owner in a federal gun-owner registration database. Most crimes are solved by other means, not by ammunition markings, and criminals could easily deface the firearm parts that would bear the serial numbers. Brady's agenda isn't about solving crimes; for them micro-stamping is another way of achieving gun and gun owner registration.

Require consumer safety standards for firearms. Even the vehemently anti-gun Violence Policy Center has said this would lead to standards too difficult for firearm manufacturers to achieve, thus ending firearm production.
We close with yet another Brady lie, "These proposals are clearly constitutional under the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decision in District of Columbia v. Heller and they pose no threat to the interests of law-abiding gun owners." Heller clearly said that laws cannot deprive people of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms for defensive purposes. As for "the interests of gun owners," we'll follow the Supreme Court's example, and let gun owners speak for themselves. The Court declared D.C.'s handgun ban unconstitutional because gun owners consider handguns to be the type of firearm best suited for self-defense.

The time is coming when those who kill you will think they are offering service to God. Jesus - (John 16.2) A penny saved is a government oversight.
5 years 46 weeks ago, 10:01 AM

Pkato

Pkato's picture

Rank:
General
Points:
3354
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Location:
Fort Walton Beach, Florida, United States

Stop This Man
by Ted Nugent

One sector of the American economy that is booming is the absolute orgy of guns and
ammunition sales. I am pretty certain President Obama will not say anything positive about this economic news.

I have read more than one report that shows how the surge of civilian firepower sales began back when it appeared that Obama was likely to be elected. The already-brisk guns and ammo market blew up another 25% once he was elected. Reason: freedom lovers do not trust liberal President Obama. His nomination for Attorney General, Mr. Eric Holder, proves that distrust is justified.

Both President Obama and Mr. Holder are avowed gun-control zealots--typical of the loony, anti-freedom wing of the Democratic Party. Do not believe President Obama's or Mr. Holder's thinly veiled statements about supporting an individual's right to own guns, but rather review their previous career long, freedom-restricting, gun-grabbing statements.

Mr. Holder has a long, ugly record of attacking freedom. He has consistently supported gun bans, raising the age that someone can purchase a weapon, supporting registration and licensing, waiting periods, and his all-time favorite-the felon's dream of gun-free zone sheeple.

Fact: Mr. Holder has never met a socialist gun control measure he did not like.

Just last year, Mr. Holder signed an amicus brief in support of Washington DC's ban on all handguns and the use of a gun for self-defense in DC homes. He stated, "the Second Amendment did not protect an individual right to keep and bear arms" and that the Second Amendment was only intended for government militias. The Supreme Court
found otherwise and found that DC's anti-freedom and pro-crime gun control law was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court voted for freedom. The good guys won, President Obama and Holder lost to the Supreme Court. Go figure.

Mysteriously, when Mr. Holder worked for President Clinton and in charge of the instant background check system, the system was routinely broken and off-line. Miraculously, when the Bush administration took over in 2001 the system rarely broke down. Is that a coincidence? Maybe. And maybe not. I’m in the “maybe not” camp.

Truth is, what Mr. Holder really supports is more law-abiding citizens being victimized by recidivistic, violent punks on parole. If enacted, his anti-freedom views will create more innocent victims and Mr. Holder knows it. While Mr. Holder is personally protected by heavily armed law enforcement officers, he does not believe you and I have a right to protect ourselves and our loved ones with a gun. He is a hypo-hypocrite who
deserves to be exposed, and I challenge our senators to vote against his confirmation.

To those who tried to expose his views in the confirmation hearing, I say “attaboy.” But Holder bobbed and weaved and really didn’t answer the questions. So now the ONLY thing conservative senators can do is vote against his confirmation.

Every one of our founding fathers supported an individual's right to own guns. Unlike President Obama and Mr. Holder, these vanguards of freedom understood that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness can not be achieved without being able to protect yourself and your loved ones from human scum who would deny you these fundamental God-given rights. Our founding fathers were also very distrustful of any government that would restrict its citizens from owning guns. Clearly, Mr. Holder and President Obama disagree with our founding fathers.

It matters not to Mr. Holder the tens of thousands of innocent law-abiding citizens who are victims of violent thugs in America each year. Mr. Holder does not care that law-abiding citizens use guns roughly two million times each year to stop crime and save innocent lives. These facts, however interesting, fall on the deaf ears of Mr. Holder and President Obama. Makes one wonder just who's side they are on, doesn't it?

What President Obama and Mr. Holder obviously want is control. Instead of citizens, they want to make us their Fedzilla subjects. Studying other gun-grabbing regimes of the past, they know the first thing that needs to be done to turn us from citizens to subjects is to disarm us. My advice to American freedom lovers is to continue to buy more guns and
more ammunition and to join the National Rifle Association.

If Mr. Holder's anti-freedom views are not reprehensible enough, as the number two guy at the Department of Justice Mr. Holder worked to commute the jail sentences of unrepentant FALN terrorists in 1999 so that Mrs. Clinton could gain political points with Puerto Rican voters while she was campaigning for the US Senate in New York. And this is the guy President Obama wants to be the chief law enforcement officer of the United States? God help us all.

Mr. Holder is no friend of freedom or the Second Amendment. He is not worthy to be your city's dog catcher much less our Attorney General.

JOIN THE NRA!!!

Patrolman Kato
Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself.
They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone
under independence. -- George Washington
5 years 46 weeks ago, 10:09 AM

Reaper308

Reaper308's picture


Rank:
Secretary of Defense
Points:
6226
Join Date:
Jun 2008
Location:
Airstrip One, Oceania
AMEN TED

well said!

"Proelium Comminus Auctoritate" "Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is a muzzle flash."
5 years 46 weeks ago, 10:14 AM

Eturnit3

Eturnit3's picture

Rank:
Lieutenant General
Points:
798
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Location:
Grass Valley , CA
Life member

Nuff Said.

The time is coming when those who kill you will think they are offering service to God. Jesus - (John 16.2) A penny saved is a government oversight.
5 years 46 weeks ago, 10:19 AM

traumatriage1911

traumatriage1911's picture

Rank:
Major General
Points:
446
Join Date:
Jan 2009
Location:
Magalia, California

that a halfbreed black man gets into office, and the whole country slaps on ammo belts and buys every gun legal in site? Thats mass racism, LOL, yah, we as humans have coma a long way alright, I wonder how well Obama sleeps at night?

"You and your mom are hillbillies. This is a house of learned doctors." "You're not a doctor. You're a big, fat, curly-headed fuck."
5 years 46 weeks ago, 10:26 AM

Eturnit3

Eturnit3's picture

Rank:
Lieutenant General
Points:
798
Join Date:
Dec 2008
Location:
Grass Valley , CA

Grabbed all the ammo n guns they can because a halfbreed was elected... Im pretty sure that America grabbed all the guns and ammo it could because the halfbreed's stance on gun control, not to mention all the good people he's surrounded himself with. Look out socialism, here we come

The time is coming when those who kill you will think they are offering service to God. Jesus - (John 16.2) A penny saved is a government oversight.
5 years 46 weeks ago, 1:46 PM

runawaygun762

runawaygun762's picture

Rank:
Vice President
Points:
8929
Join Date:
Nov 2008
Location:
Richland, MO, United States

Not on the same scale, but Democrats have always been great salesmen for the gun industry. And I'm sure President Obama sleeps wonderfully. You would too with the security he has.

"I have always been a soldier. I have known no other life. The calling of arms, I have followed from boyhood. I have never sought another." From The Virtues of War, by Steven Pressfield.

Who's Online

Guns Lot Activity
Users
Currently Active Users: 1251 (0 members and 1251 guests)

Guns Lot Statistics
Stats Topics: 8,687, Comments: 161,583, Members: 23,517
Welcome our newest member: Hank6046

Recent Activity