Forums / Political & Legal / california cities being sued for gun rights violations

5 years 44 weeks ago, 8:10 AM

jay sedler

jay sedler's picture

Lieutenant General
Join Date:
Oct 2009
redding, california, United States

San Carlos, CA (May 9, 2012) – In an important step to secure the rights of California gun owners, The Calguns Foundation, the Second Amendment Foundation, and two individual residents of California have filed a new federal lawsuit in San Francisco. The case, entitled Churchill, et. al. v. Harris, et al., alleges that the police departments of both San Francisco and Oakland are unlawfully refusing to return lawfully-owned firearms to individuals who have had charges dropped after police investigations proved that they had done nothing wrong.

The ongoing seizure of those firearms is a violation of the Second and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution. What’s more, the departments’ refusal to return property after all charges are dropped is theft.

"In California, the Evidence Code makes it clear that simple possession is proof of ownership of almost all types of common property, including firearms," said Don Kilmer, attorney for the plaintiffs. "The California Department of Justice is misleading police departments in such a way that they violate the rights of gun owners who were investigated and found to not have violated the law."

The Oakland and San Francisco Police departments appear to be relying on a Department of Justice document that is being attached to the required “Law Enforcement Gun Release”, or LEGR, reports indicating that the requester may lawfully own and possess firearms. The document claims that the requesting person has to provide proof of ownership for every firearm when they go to retrieve their seized property.

According to longstanding California law, every firearm seized during a police investigation must be inventoried; a copy of that list is given to the person from whom firearms are seized. Every law enforcement agency knows which person they took firearms from and what specific firearms were taken.

"It's hard enough for a law-abiding gun owner to live through the uncertainty and fear caused by a false allegation or arrest, but to have the very people who are trusted and sworn to serve them then steal their property after they've been exonerated is inexcusable," said Calguns Foundation chairman Gene Hoffman. "Law-abiding Californians should not be forced to seek out expensive legal representation just to get back what is rightfully theirs in the first place."

CRY HAVOC and let slip the dogs of war!
5 years 44 weeks ago, 10:34 AM


MattyTheJet's picture

Lieutenant General
Join Date:
Mar 2012
Sebring, Florida, United States
About time!

California needs to be taken to task on a whole lot of other gun issues, too. Hopefully once this is over and done with they will be and we can turn California back into a free state.

Who's Online

Guns Lot Activity
Currently Active Users: 1079 (0 members and 1079 guests)

Users Active within the last 24 hours
jpdental, jf.chandler sr., tallguy007, teko52
Guns Lot Statistics
Stats Topics: 8,915, Comments: 158,768, Members: 23,516
Welcome our newest member: Hank6046

Recent Activity