Forums / Political & Legal / Downsizing Goverment

2 years 39 weeks ago, 8:49 AM

samD

samD's picture

Rank:
President
Points:
15597
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Location:
Green Valley, Free State of Arizona, United States
Downsizing Goverment

When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to happen is they reduce their staff and workers. The remaining workers must find ways to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would be eliminated as well.
Wall street and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of "tough decision", and the board of directors gives upper corporate management big bonuses..
Our government should not be immune from similar risks.

Therefore:
Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members. Reduce Senate members from 100 to 50 (one per State). Then, reduce their remaining staff by 25%.
Accomplish this over the next 8 years (two steps/two elections) and of course this would require some redistricting.

Some Yearly Monetary Gains Include:
$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200 pay/member/ yr.)
$437,100,000 for elimination of their staff. (Estimate $1.3 Million in staff per each member of the House, and $3 Million in staff per each member of the Senate every year)
$108,350,000 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.
$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork barrel earmarks each year. (Those members whose jobs are gone. Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at $15 Billion/yr).
The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and improve efficiencies.. It might even be in their best interests to work together for the good of our country!
We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep track of what your representative is doing.
Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when the current number of representatives was established. (Telephone, computers, cell phones to name a few)

Note:
Congress does not hesitate to head home for extended weekends, holidays and recesses, when what the nation needs is a real fix for economic problems. Also, we had 3 senators who were not doing their jobs for the 18+ months (on the campaign trail) and still they all accepted full pay. Minnesota survived very well with only one senator for the first half of this year. These facts alone support a reduction in senators and congress.

Summary of opportunity:
$44,108,400 reduction of congress members.
$282,100,000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff.
$150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff.
$70,850,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members.
$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members.
$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress members.
$8,084,558,400 per year, estimated total savings. (That's 8-BILLION just to start!)
Corporate America does these types of cuts all the time.
There's even a name for it.
"Downsizing."
------------------------------
Also, if Congresspersons were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (like everyone else) in order to collect retirement benefits, taxpayers could save a bundle.
Now they get full retirement after serving only ONE term.
----------------------------------------
IF you are happy with how Washington spends our taxes, delete this message.
Otherwise, it's time to "downsize" Congress, Democrat or GOP

2 years 39 weeks ago, 10:19 AM

jay sedler

jay sedler's picture

Rank:
Lieutenant General
Points:
1546
Join Date:
Oct 2009
Location:
redding, california, United States

sounds good sam,only thing id fear is one senator in california.with the overwhelming majority of libs in so cal they'd always get a leftwing proud peta, sandal wearing, pro-choice, anti-gun fear mongering, anti-tobacco,higher gas taxing,constitution burning, vegetarian,liberal democrat who drives a huge suv on our dime and tells us all to buy smart cars and save the planet,who takes away our guns and has an armed escort everywhere they go,who dosnt do any real work,or use that big "education"from harvard or wherever they graduated from,but lives in a huuuge mansion that stands on what used to be a beautiful piece of forested land,and turns around and tells us we are all responsible for raping this land,and is the only vote from the state in senate...yikes! not that i disagree with you,just i know Kalifornia.

CRY HAVOC and let slip the dogs of war!
2 years 39 weeks ago, 10:32 AM

samD

samD's picture

Rank:
President
Points:
15597
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Location:
Green Valley, Free State of Arizona, United States
jay sedler,

I too know Kalifornia, having spent my first 57 years in the SF Bay Area. Born Oaklnd, raised my family in Danville, Contra Costa County. That is why I left.

2 years 39 weeks ago, 2:32 PM

jay sedler

jay sedler's picture

Rank:
Lieutenant General
Points:
1546
Join Date:
Oct 2009
Location:
redding, california, United States
I'm about ready to

I'm about ready to leave...bad people,worse politicians,no good jobs.

CRY HAVOC and let slip the dogs of war!

Who's Online

Guns Lot Activity
Users
Currently Active Users: 1059 (1 member and 1058 guests)
teko52

Guns Lot Statistics
Stats Topics: 8,675, Comments: 161,414, Members: 23,517
Welcome our newest member: Hank6046

Recent Activity