Forums / Gun Discussion / Hillary Clinton inadvertently supports gun rights

5 years 3 weeks ago, 9:27 PM

samD

samD's picture

Rank:
President
Points:
15597
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Location:
Green Valley, Free State of Arizona, United States

March 27, 1:17 PM ·
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently gave an interview where she admitted that the United States was partially to blame for the drug violence in Mexico. Little did she know that her comments clearly made the case in favor of gun ownership rights, especially for Mexicans.

In case you didn’t see the connection, let me explain.

Guns and ammunition have been strictly banned in Mexico since the notoriously bloody Mexican Revolution nearly 100 years ago. According to gun control advocates, this outright ban on gun ownership should have reduced crime in Mexico—especially gun crime—to virtually zero. Yet, that is clearly not the case.

Clinton says that 90% of guns in Mexico are smuggled in from the United States, a statistic provided by the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms. In the United States the vast majority of guns are not banned, and in Texas and New Mexico (the two states nearest the bloodshed in Juarez), gun restrictions are almost non-existent.

So why isn’t there blood in the street in Juarez’s sister city El Paso, Texas, which is only steps across the border? One can only conclude that El Paso is safer because the citizens are allowed to own guns; they have the ability to protect themselves from the gangs and thugs that operate just over the border in Juarez.

I can already hear the anti-gun crowd screaming that guns are not the reason for the disparity in violence; that this violence is because of government corruption in Mexico, and that is the difference between Juarez and El Paso, not citizens’ right to bear arms. But this begs the question of why one city is corrupt and the other is not so, when by almost any measure the cities are very similar?

Again, the only real difference between the two seems to be that in El Paso citizens can protect themselves with guns (from both the corrupt government and the drug cartels), while in Juarez citizens are victims of a corrupt government and drug-thugs.

Frankly, I’m happy to see that Secretary Clinton has finally come around on this issue. Now it’s time for her to take the next step and push for a Mexican Right to Bear Arms, so that Mexican families can stop being victims and start taking their communities back from the drug-thugs who currently run them. I, for one, would be the first to support her.

5 years 3 weeks ago, 9:45 AM

clintlebo

clintlebo's picture


Rank:
General
Points:
2309
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Location:
land, of confusion, United States
great article

way to comb the internet samD!!

The illustration painted by this article could not be any clearer. I will email this to all my contacts. I would recommend everyone else do the same.

thank you
clint

"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." (Calvin & Hobbes)

Who's Online

Guns Lot Activity
Users
Currently Active Users: 811 (0 members and 811 guests)

Guns Lot Statistics
Stats Topics: 8,623, Comments: 160,568, Members: 23,520
Welcome our newest member: Hank6046

Recent Activity