Celebrities Unqualified to Give Political Endorsements

Celebrities Unqualified to Give Political Endorsements

by Pat Sajak
11/28/2007

Pat Sajak is a column writer for Conservative Views and donates to the Republican Party!

There have been so many debates and interviews and columns and profiles and polls, it’s hard to believe the election for president is still about 11 months away. Recently, celebrity endorsements have been making news, with Oprah Winfrey saying she would campaign for Barack Obama and Barbra Streisand making the not-so-stunning announcement that she was supporting Hillary Clinton.

There are reasons, of course, why candidates welcome such help. First, there’s the bonanza of free publicity. With so many names and faces vying for attention, what could be better than the burst of news such endorsements bring? There’s also the burst of money these high-profile celebs can bring in themselves and attract from others. Then there’s the extra attention and excitement these stars engender when they appear at a candidate’s political events. It’s far easier to attract a crowd in Des Moines if a big TV, movie or recording star is standing next to the politician.

Putting those obvious benefits aside, the question remains: do these endorsements really translate into votes? Does anyone decide which candidate to choose based on the recommendation of a TV talk show host or a singer/actress? If any group of citizens is uniquely unqualified to tell someone else how to vote, it’s those of us who live in the sheltered, privileged arena of celebrityhood. It’s one thing to buy an ab machine because Chuck Norris recommends it (he’s in good shape, isn’t he?) or a grill because George Foreman’s name is on it (he’s a great guy, so it must be a great grill!), but the idea of choosing the Leader of the Free World based on the advice of someone who lives in the cloistered world of stardom seems a bit loony to me.

This is America, and we celebrities have just as much right as anyone else to speak up about any issue. The problem is that more attention is paid to what we say because we’re well known. But why should that matter? O.J. Simpson is one of the world’s best-known celebrities, but I can’t imagine anyone following his lead in a voting booth.

I suppose anything that gets people engaged in the political process is a good thing, but the idea that a gold record, a top-ten TV show or an Oscar translates into some sort of political wisdom doesn’t make much sense to me. Trust me, one’s view of the world isn’t any clearer from the back seat of a limo.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Sajak is the host of "Wheel of Fortune" and PatSajak.com.

More From samD

3 Comments

3 years 36 weeks ago, 12:32 PM

HampsterW

HampsterW's picture

Rank:
Secretary of State
Points:
7723
Join Date:
Jan 2010
Location:
Cottonwood Heights, Utah, United States

about how they vote is swayed by their favorite celebrity, it's part of the same sickness in this country that has illiterate ghetto rats signing multi million dollar contracts for chasing a ball around, the American public just can't get enough.

Change you can truly believe in comes from the barrel of a gun---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ron Paul 2012----Vote the bastards out!---------------------------------
3 years 36 weeks ago, 5:30 PM

ecaman

ecaman's picture

Rank:
General
Points:
2613
Join Date:
Jul 2009
Location:
Payson, UT, United States
Sad commentary

The willingness of the un- or undereducated sheep to follow the lead of "celebrities" is quite simply disgusting. When one considers just what elevates some of these inane nonentities to "celebrity" status, one is forced to conclude that a significant percentage of the public is near brain dead. Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, etc., etc. are "celebrities". Ms. Spears has at least had a successful career in music. Some figures, such as Madonna and Lady Ga Ga have exceptional talent, coupled with eccentricities. But why on earth would anyone follow the lead of any of these in choosing a political candidate? Ms. Winfrey is phenomenally successful, due to her outstanding intelligence and drive, and deserves admiration. This does not, however, qualify her as someone able to choose the best political candidate for a given position.

If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. (Mark Twain).
3 years 36 weeks ago, 5:36 PM

hillbilly77

hillbilly77's picture

Rank:
Lieutenant General
Points:
1085
Join Date:
Jan 2009
Location:
Newport, Wa

Winfrey is so succesful because of the people that watch her show. They see a black women that has made a fortune and they think if that sister can do it so can I.That is wy she won so many votes for Obozo.

“If ever time should come,when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in government, our country will stand in need of it's experienced Patriots to prevent it's ruin."Samuel Adams
samD's picture
Posted by: samD
3 years 36 weeks ago
Views:
485
Comments:
3

Rating Overview

This text will be replaced

Recent Activity