Machiavelli Was Right, he said "the Swiss are the most free and most armed people" of Europe.

Machiavelli Was Right, he said "the Swiss are the most free and most armed people" of Europe.

by Charley Reese

Niccolò Machiavelli, who was a sort of Karl Rove of his day, though with more integrity, said of the Swiss that they were "the most free and most armed people" of Europe. Get it? The connection between arms and freedom?

That statement is still true of the Swiss. Many people know that they practice neutrality, but not many know that they practice armed neutrality. If the gun controllers' claim that the mere presence of arms leads to mayhem were true, the Swiss would have wiped themselves out years ago. There are guns and gun ranges all over the place. You would be hard-pressed to find a Swiss home without a firearm and ammunition. Yet, the Swiss have a very low crime rate.

If you were a robber or a rapist, who would you rather have as a victim? Someone who is armed, or someone who is defenseless? Even a stupid criminal knows the answer to that question.

If the police can protect us – which is another claim the gun-control people make – then why are so many people murdered, raped and robbed? Even the television fictional stories tell you the answer to that. The cops get there after the crime has been committed. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a crime scene. Nearly all the cop shows open with the police looking at a dead, unarmed body.

Do you really believe that the men who had just fought a long and bloody war against the British and were writing what we call the Bill of Rights had this conversation:

"Well, let's see. We've guaranteed freedom of assembly, of religion, of speech and of the press. Oh, my gosh, we've forgotten the duck hunters. They'll raise heck if we leave them out, so we'd better write an amendment for them."

The Second Amendment has nothing whatsoever to do with hunting. It states: "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

The men who wrote these amendments were pretty darn fluent in English. If they had intended the right to keep and bear arms to apply only to the militia, they would have said so. They would have written "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the states to arm their respective militias shall not be infringed."

They didn't say that. The main sentence says "right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." "People" means everybody, not just the members of the militia. The subordinate clause, "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state," just gives one, but not the only, reason why all the people have a right to keep and bear arms. The militia, after all, was drawn from the people. It was not the Army. The first meaning of "bear," by the way, is to carry, bring or take. Americans have the right to keep arms and to carry them.

The word "regulate" in those days meant trained, and do you notice again the connection between arms and freedom? The subordinate clause refers to a "free state." Obviously, an unfree state would not allow the people to be armed.

The Founding Fathers were not urban neurotics like so many of today's politicians. They were almost all outdoor people. Guns were to them just tools, like their axes or plows. You couldn't survive in the wilderness without firearms, and at the time of our Revolution, there were only about 3 million people from Maine to Georgia.

Nor were there any police forces. There was no Secret Service, FBI or any of the other alphabet law-enforcement agencies. If you decided to travel, you traveled at your own risk, and you can bet people traveled armed. When I was last at Williamsburg, Va., they had a room in one of the historical houses arranged as if a traveler had just arrived and unpacked. There on top of a dresser was a pistol.

2 Comments

5 years 28 weeks ago, 6:38 PM

LittleDragon

LittleDragon's picture

Rank:
Points:
2560
Join Date:
Apr 2009
Location:
Dallas, Texas

that is just after both civil war, the one in America and the one our family flee from in Nihon. in our family history we fled from what would today be call a Police State, only in Nihon, at the time of the ending of the Shogunate, even the Police fought each other. it became very bloody after nearly 200 sai of peace in Nihon under the Shogunate, but when the Shogunate began to disintegrate, many many "militia" vie for power until the new Emperor Meiji finally consolidate his power and a new and modern and forward looking Nihon was born. however there were very many local and bloody fight between the differing militia of the samurai. ryo family came away from the chaos and come to America during the time of the disintegration of the Shogunate and before the rise of the Emperor Meiji. we not illegal immigrant either, but come to America under the law and family have excellent record of this too. first family sail to hawaii where stay for many sai but later the branch of ryo pops family sail on to san francisco. during the time of the Shogunate only the samurai had the right to bear arms neh. ryo family was able to leave Nihon because family was samurai and could defend it freedom because of arms.
it very true what you say too about the wording of the 2nd Amendment. ryo and little brother were raise on the idea of a direct relation between arms and freedom. since the founding of America it seem like almost every generation of Americans have had to fight with arms for their freedom. ryo is very proud to be a natural born American and also proud to be one America's newest riflemen. ryo have learn very much from you and others here at Gunslot since was first invite to join. you keep up the good work Ojiisan. ryo is very proud to learn from you.

Your ichiban magomusuko,

LittleDragon

Moshi Moshi from LittleDragon
5 years 10 weeks ago, 1:13 AM

ecaman

ecaman's picture

Rank:
General
Points:
2613
Join Date:
Jul 2009
Location:
Payson, UT, United States
Impressive

Your post was excellent, SamD. I completely agree with your reading of the 2nd Amendment. And besides the quote you cited, Machiavelli had very much to say about government that is unfortunately true.
LD, your comment is both informative & impressive. The history of your family is very interesting & inspiring. I'm glad you're here, & an American citizen.
LD, if I may respectfully ask, please explain "ryo". Is that your name, or is it a term in Japanese to indicate yourself?

If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. (Mark Twain).
samD's picture
Posted by: samD
5 years 28 weeks ago
Views:
1,967
Comments:
2

Rating Overview

This text will be replaced

Recent Activity