BUT, he should have included, "Have a Nice Day".
I know i'm dumb, but this picture, just like the Suzanna Hupp video, really did something for me. They are both statements of understanding as to the true meaning behind the second amendment. All too often people don't want to admit that the purpose of the second amendment is so we don't lose our rights as enumerated in the others. People don't want to be seen as "Right wing gun nuts" (I am) or "Militia members" (I will be when I retire from the standing army), so they try to make it seem less offensive by saying it's for recreational arms, or self-defense against criminals. Although I agree with the self defense argument in that criminals violate our rights when they victimize us, that is not the primary purpose. Maybe it is my upbringing or where i lived as a child, or the CIA implant in my head, but I have a very hard time understanding how university educated men can feel the need to debate the wording of the second amendment and what the founders meant when they wrote it. I graduated from Lebanon High School in Lebanon, MO with a 1.8 GPA, and I understand fully why they wrote "shall not be infringed", as opposed to "shall not be unreasonably infringed"
Love it. I know several people who had the same thing happen to them